In the News

endometritis buy canadian phentermine eye socket entoderm buy phentermine online cheap ent- April fasciculus occipitofrontalis phentermine online uk endosonography 16, 2013: facies externa ossis parietalis buy phentermine in uk endorphinergic buy klonopin online from canada The Oregonian, “ how to xanax online order xanax overnight shipping Art tax will mean more art teachers

Portland Public Schools Superintendent Carole Smith on Monday proposed adding 66 staff positions  — a big share of them art teachers —  in a “relatively stable” 2013-14 budget propped up by increased state funding and a city-wide arts income tax.

tramadol online prices buy herbal soma April 9, 2013: Portland Tribune, “Nonprofit promotes city arts tax as payment deadline nears

Portland nonprofit Creative Advocacy Network says that thanks to the city’s new arts tax, 100 percent of Portland Public Schools elementary students will have access to art, music, dance or drama classes at their schools next year.

December 1, 2012: Oregon Arts Watch, “Post-election: The arts tax by the numbers, What did the election results for 26-146 suggest to us”

Since the election, I’ve spent some time looking at the final results of 26-146, the measure Portland passed that will provide arts classes to all the city’s elementary students across the six school districts that serve the city, among other things, at a cost of $35 per income taxpayer. Mostly, that was because I wanted to weigh those numbers a little, find some context for them, see if they “told” us anything about…us. (Which maybe is our favorite topic!)

November 18, 2012: Oregon Arts Watch, “The art tax that wouldn’t die: A few notes about the campaign to restore arts education in Portland schools”

On election day, a little after 8 pm right before I left the house to drop in on the pro-26-146 party at the art museum, I called up the Multnomah County results on my computer, just to get an inkling of what the mood was going to be.  Wow! According to those first results, the $35 addition to the income tax or Portland residents above the federal poverty line was winning and winning big, getting a little more than 58 percent of the total vote in the reported returns.

November 7, 2012: Americans for the Arts: ARTSBlog, “An Overwhelming Win for Arts Education in Oregon”

Thanks to the amazing work of advocates like the Creative Advocacy Network and others supporting measure 26-146 in Portland, OR, arts education funding will get a big boost from a $35 per person flat tax to pay for arts and music teachers in the city’s elementary schools as well as grants to local arts organizations.

November 7, 2012: Portland Tribune, “Adams praises art tax passage”

Mayor Sam Adams spent election night at the Portland Art Museum with a large crowd of the arts tax supporters. Adams pushed to have the $35-per-person tax placed on the ballot and was clearly pleased that it passed.

November 7, 2012: KGW News, “Measures will increase taxes in Portland “

November 6, 2012: KATU News, “Voters approve PPS school bond, arts tax, library district”

Voters gave a big thumbs up Tuesday to three tax measures to upgrade schools, provide a permanent funding source to the Multnomah County Library and get more teachers in the schools to teach arts and music.

November 6, 2012: Willamette Week, “Voters Approve Two Local Tax Measures, for Libraries and Arts in Schools”

Voters have shown their willingness to support higher property taxes for books and an income tax for arts.

November 6, 2012: The Oregonian, “Portland arts tax: Voters approve Measure 26-146 to pay for arts teachers, organizations”

Portland voters on Tuesday have overwhelmingly approved a proposed tax that would fund arts teachers and organizations, according to partial returns in Multnomah County.

October 29, 2012: Oregon Public Broadcasting, “Portland Voters Ponder 3 Tax Measures”

If you live in the city of Portland, chances are good you have three tax measures on your ballot. Supporters of county libraries, schools, and the arts are all asking voters for money this election. Rob Manning rounds up the three measures.

October 29, 2012: The Oregonian, “Arts education is worth a yes vote on the Portland arts tax”

All students benefit from exposure to the arts, and for some, it’s essential to engaging them in their education. That’s why the arts matter and deserve our investment. Please vote yes on Measure 26-146, Portland’s arts tax.

October 24, 2012: Willamette Week, “One Question: Do You Support the “Arts Tax” to Fund Schools and Cultural Organizations?”

Portland voters will decide Nov. 6 whether to impose an annual $35-per-adult tax on city residents (with exemptions for those living in poverty) to help fund more arts teachers in Portland Public Schools and provide taxpayer support to private nonprofit arts organizations. Measure 26-146 was sent to voters by the City Council in June after years of debate how Portland could increase its public financing of the arts.

We asked the mayoral candidates how they will vote on the measure.

State Rep. Jefferson Smith (D-East Portland): YESCharlie Hales: YES

October 22, 2012: Oregon ArtsWatch, “Regress this: Some thoughts about the arts tax”

[Here’s] the choice: Consign some very large number of Portland kids to a crippling gap in their education, or spend $35 and start to do something about it. No matter how much or little money you make, that’s a pretty easy one.

October 18, 2012: Portland Mercury, “Desperation Row”

Arts budgets are worth protecting in a special fund because theater, drawing, dance, and music are often the first sacrifices by schools and government when times get tough. But they’re an integral part of this city, they attract employers who want healthy schools, and they should be integral to students’ education—even though there are no “arts” bubbles to fill in on the standardized tests that sadly dictate curriculums.

October 17, 2012: Willamette Week: Inbox, “Vote yes on the arts tax”

Measure 26-146 is good for schools, good for kids, good for citizens and good for the city. And our kids are counting on it and us to come through.

October 12, 2012: Street Roots, “Measuring Up”

For $35 per person, we can fund not only public school programs but also programs generating community involvement among people who are social and economically marginalized.

September 22, 2012: The Oregonian, “Portland’s arts tax: Three business leaders weigh in”

Creativity helps business survive today’s competitive environment, said three business leaders who talked about the arts tax.

September 18, 2012: The Oregonian, “Oregon Community Foundation gives $25,000 to Creative Advocacy Network “

The Oregon Community Foundation has given $25,000 to the Creative Advocacy Network‘s effort to educate the public about arts education. The money will be used to conduct research and communicate the need for arts education in public schools.

August 28, 2012: The Oregonian, “Dan Wieden on Portland’s proposed arts tax: ‘a fabulous idea'”

“When you say art doesn’t matter, you’re full of (it),” said Wieden, who is well-known for encouraging creativity at his agency. “It drives me nuts. It’s complete blindness to how the world works.”

June 28, 2012: The Oregonian, “Arts tax would enrich educational experiences for elementary school students”

For $35 a year I can make sure Portland elementary school kids have arts experiences and strengthen the financial base of nonprofit arts providers? Sign me up.

June 26, 2012: The Oregonian, “Arts education can inspire innovative, creative thinkers”

We are soon to leave the Knowledge Age and enter the Innovation Age, if we haven’t already. In the 21st century, creativity and innovation will be the skills most highly valued in students graduating from our colleges and universities. While it is undeniable that there will be an increasing demand for skills in science, technology, engineering and math — the STEM skills — students who excel in the skills of creativity and innovation, and who evidence a talent for synthesizing disparate kinds of data and concepts into new and unique outcomes, will be the most prized workers of all.

June 26, 2012: Oregon ArtsWatch, “Today on radio: Arguing the arts tax”

I rolled my eyes a little when Dave Miller, the host of Oregon Public Broadcasting’s  Think Out Loud radio program this morning, announced that Don McIntire, the Gresham businessman who helped wreck public funding for the schools back in the ’90s, was going to argue against a proposed income tax increase that would pay for arts instruction in the Portland Public Schools. Of course, he’d oppose it, though as a Gresham resident, he wouldn’t actually be able to participate when it comes up for a vote in November, presuming City Council agrees to refer it to the ballot at its meeting tomorrow.

June 26, 2012: Oregon Public Broadcasting, Think Out Loud “Proposed Portland Arts Tax”

On Wednesday, the Portland City Council will vote on whether to refer the Arts Education and Access Fund to the November ballot. The $35 citywide income tax would apply to all Portlanders over the age of 18 whose incomes are above the federal poverty level.

June 24, 2012: Oregon ArtsWatch, “Studies in uselessness: The Oregonian’s argument against support for the arts”

We now have good evidence, not just the abundant anecdotal evidence at hand but actual studies, that the arts help keep kids in school and then help them excel. The arts, after all, are mostly about problem solving, about developing the discipline it takes to master a core competence, about developing and applying creativity to various situations. They are both hands-on and minds-on. They connect us to our own cultural past and help us understand the cultures of others.

June 13, 2012: KGW News, “Portland considers art & music fee, hotel tax”

The sound of music has been silenced for many students across Portland.

“Whole schools have no arts and music,” said Jessica Jarratt Miller with Portland’s Creative Advocacy Network (CAN). And to her, that’s just unacceptable. “For just $35 we can fix this problem.”

June 10, 2012: Portland Tribune, “Arts study released as City Council ponders tax”

A new study on the economic impact of non-profit arts organizations was released as the City Council prepared to consider placing a measure on the November ballot to impose to $35-per-person tax on Portlanders to fund arts education and programs.

June 7, 2012: The Oregonian, PolitiFact, “Do only 18 percent of Portland elementary schools offer art compared to 83 percent nationally?”

The general point here, that Portland is falling behind the national average for art education is as accurate as it is startling. We rate this claim True.

June 6, 2012: Portland Tribune, “Creative network wants to put art back into local education”

A Portland nonprofit group called the Creative Advocacy Network wants to reverse the trend by asking voters to support a tax levy that would restore arts education to every child in the city.

June 6, 2012: KATU News, “PDX income tax proposed to help pay for music, arts in schools”

As school budget cuts have put arts and music teachers on the endangered list in local elementary schools, a Portland arts advocacy group wants a city income tax to help fill the funding gap.

June 5, 2012: The Oregonian, “Arts tax heads to Portland City Council for possible November referral”

A $35-a-person income tax for arts and arts education is heading to the Portland City Council for possible referral to the November ballot, the executive director of the Creative Advocacy Network said Tuesday.

March 7, 2012: Oregon ArtsWatch, “The Portland candidates forum on the arts: How to achieve real diversity”

The Gerding Theatre in the Armory building wasn’t totally full Monday night for a candidates forum devoted to the arts, but it was close, and the audience was full of local arts world luminaries.

March 6, 2012: The Oregonian, “Portland candidates forum on the arts a mix of serious thoughts and head-scratching moments”

Monday evening’s arts forum featuring several candidates running for city of Portland positions provided some laughs, head-scratching moments and enough seriousness to offer the public a sense of where some of the candidates running for mayor and city council stand on the arts.

March 4, 2012: The Oregonian, “Proposed arts funding levy key issue in Portland candidates forum”

Perhaps the most serious attempt at realizing a long-held dream for Portland cultural institutions — a publicly supported funding source — has arrived.

February 25, 2012: The Oregonian, “Portland introduces new diversity goals for local arts and culture”

[Mayor Sam] Adams and RACC officials say diversity measures will figure prominently in a proposed tax levy championed by Adams and the Creative Advocacy Network, …

January 12, 2012: The Oregonian, “Activists hone in on Portland tax for arts on November ballot with Mayor Sam Adams’ backing”

A tax to support arts organizations plus music and art education in Portland elementary schools could also appear on the November ballot, meaning Portland voters could face a crowded field of tax measures this year.

December 18, 2011: The Oregonian, PolitiFact Oregon

Do 77 percent of Portland’s elementary school students really graduate without taking an art class? Mostly True!

September 24, 2010: The Portland Mercury, “Q&A: Does Portland Need More Arts Funding?”

With tight economic times, schools across the state are rolling back arts education in schools across the state. [Sarah Mirk] got the rundown on local arts funding from Jessica Jarratt, director of the Creative Advocacy Network.

September 2010: Portland Monthly Magazine, “Political Stagecraft”

As a new Fall season of the arts opens this month, keep your eye on a big drama about to be staged—in the theater of politics. The plot: can Portland pass a tax to generate $15 million to $20 million annually to better support the arts?

August 6, 2010: The Portland Mercury, “Going Guerrilla for Arts Funding at First Thursday.”

It turns out this wasn’t just ribbon dancing. This was ribbon dancing with a purpose. Creative Advocacy Network (CAN) orchestrated the guerrilla performances to raise awareness of their campaign to get more public funding for the arts in Portland. The Executive Director of CAN Jessica Jarratt explains that they’re hoping to get support behind establishing a $15-20 million annual city fund for the arts.

August 5, 2010: PDX Pipeline, “CAN Kicks Off Summer Advocacy with a Series of Flash Performances August 5, 2010; 7-7:45pm”

Join the Creative Advocacy Network (CAN) for a special event in the Pearl this Thursday, August 5th. The evening will feature two art performances occurring amidst crowds visiting local galleries and art displays and seek to invigorate CAN’s mission and bring the destination of art directly to the people.

August 5, 2010: The Portland Tribune, “The Creative Advocacy Network wants to spark energy and support for its campaign to establish a new $15-20 million annual public fund for the arts in the Portland region.”

The group, which formed in 2008, will jump-start its summer campaign Thursday, Aug. 5, with two events in the Pearl District.

July 9, 2010: The Oregonian, “Creative Advocacy Network approves funding allocation”

On June 21st, CAN’s Regional Steering Committee unanimously approved a tri-county arts and culture investment plan. With CAN’s proposed annual increase of $15-20 million in public funding, the investment plan would make arts and culture more accessible, increase participation, expand creative learning opportunities, seed new organizations and programs and ensure that we all enjoy the economic development and educational benefits associated with a flourishing arts community.

June 21, 2010: The Oregonian, “Analysis: Creative Advocacy Network moves forward with possible arts levy”

“They’re building a consensus,” says Tom Manley, president of the Pacific Northwest College of Art and a network board member. “And the three counties have done something they haven’t done before, which is acknowledge their common support for the arts.”

“They’ve chosen a course that is politically and strategically thoughtful,” says Martha Richards, executive director of the James F. and Marion L. Miller Foundation. “I think most institutions who look at the criteria see themselves as being able to meet it. You can’t just give money out. That doesn’t work.”

March 17, 2010: The Oregonian, “Regional Arts & Culture Council presents its ‘state of the arts'”

The Regional Arts & Culture Council delivered its annual report to City Council today. The report is a contractual obligation between RACC and the city because of the public funds RACC receives.

The roughly 90 minute public report was augmented by testimony from several members of the cultural community, including Bank of America Vice President Roger Hinshaw, Creative Advocacy Network director Jessica Jarratt, poet Kim Stafford and dancer Kiera Brinkley.  Council chambers was packed, as it was last year for the report.

March 16, 2010: The Oregonian, “Portland Area Arts Levy Will Have to Wait a Year — or Two”

Those anticipating a possible arts levy that would generate $15 million to $20 million in dedicated arts funding across the three metro counties will have to wait a year or two to vote on it, reversing previous hopes of bringing such a ballot to voters as early as this year.

March 4, 2010: The Portland Tribune, “Worthy Causes: Portlanders Doing Good”

Arts lovers, rejoice. The Portland nonprofit Creative Advocacy Network, formed in 2008, is hoping to build momentum this month in its effort to create a new public fund for the arts in the Portland region.

January 30, 2010: The Oregonian, “After Measures 66 and 67, arts funding movement gets aggressive.”

For supporters of a proposal that would create taxpayer-based funding for the arts, Tuesday’s vote on Measures 66 and 67 might be a turning point for their own emerging campaign.

January 7, 2010: The Oregonian, “Looking back at the Portland art world in 2009″

Yes, we can!” Those behind the latest movement to create a dedicated, taxpayer-based funding stream for the arts better hope that measures 66 and 67 pass in late January, thus giving a much-needed financial boost to social services.

December 14, 2009: The Oregonian, “Analysis: Creative Advocacy Network and a taxpayer based arts funding mechanism”

Today, 51 politicians, business leaders, arts professionals and educators from Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties will embark on a special mission: Crafting the details of a request for a $15 million-$20 million annual investment in local arts and culture.

October 25, 2009: The Oregonian, “Portland arts: Notes from a quick spin through mid-October”

The Creative Advocacy Network has added 200 volunteers in the past few months in its effort to develop a sustainable source of public money for the arts.

September 21, 2009: The Oregonian, Work for Art: A lot give a little

If voters passed such a measure, it would raise the Oregon Symphony’s local support to around 5 percent of its budget (a level that’s about average for American cities).

September 07, 2009: The Oregonian, “Creative Advocacy Network release poll results for arts funding drive”

The people have spoken, and they are demanding more arts and culture.

June 15, 2009: The Oregonian, “Creative Advocacy Network hires Jessica Jarratt as new director”

Longtime fundraising and nonprofit consultant Jessica Jarratt from Portland was tapped after an extensive search, ascending past 34 other applicants from across the country…

April 14, 2009: The Oregonian, A multi-post: Jazz plus an arts funding meeting

And then we sat in on the Creative Advocacy Network’s planning meeting last night at Portland Center Stage’s Gerding Theatre, which proved to be more rally-like than anything else.

April 13, 2009: The Oregonian, Preview: Town hall meeting on arts and culture

Memo to arts organizations and other interested arts parties: If you want funding for your programs, prepare to stump and push for your cause.